<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confluence of Mobile, PC, TV and Cinema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/confluence-of-mobile-pc-tv-and-cinema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/confluence-of-mobile-pc-tv-and-cinema/</link>
	<description>Random musings on technology, mobility, usability, social media, the Web and other cool stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sachendra Yadav</title>
		<link>http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/confluence-of-mobile-pc-tv-and-cinema/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachendra Yadav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachendra.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Good point Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Barrett</title>
		<link>http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/confluence-of-mobile-pc-tv-and-cinema/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachendra.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s not about 4 screens. It&#039;s about X screens... or multi-screens. 

gaming machines (portable and home based), out of home ads are becoming interactive with bluetooth and 2d codes, and with LCD technology becoming so cheap, there will be more screen in more places doing more things... and they&#039;ll all be IP based - so convergence will be across the board. 

Eventually :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s not about 4 screens. It&#8217;s about X screens&#8230; or multi-screens. </p>
<p>gaming machines (portable and home based), out of home ads are becoming interactive with bluetooth and 2d codes, and with LCD technology becoming so cheap, there will be more screen in more places doing more things&#8230; and they&#8217;ll all be IP based &#8211; so convergence will be across the board. </p>
<p>Eventually <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachendra Yadav</title>
		<link>http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/confluence-of-mobile-pc-tv-and-cinema/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachendra Yadav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachendra.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-241</guid>
		<description>@Matt 2-3 years does seem short for a shift of this magnitude

@Jason The value is for users to be able to switch between different screens seamlessly based on context. To be able to start off on the mobile where I left off on my PC or TV or a combination thereof.
I haven&#039;t thought of how to monetize it yet, I&#039;m sure business models will spring up around it. Something of this scale will need deep pockets and a lot of tie-ups to pull it through, so it&#039;ll definitely be a differentiator for the big players... but who knows if a new Google will spring up from this mix :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt 2-3 years does seem short for a shift of this magnitude</p>
<p>@Jason The value is for users to be able to switch between different screens seamlessly based on context. To be able to start off on the mobile where I left off on my PC or TV or a combination thereof.<br />
I haven&#8217;t thought of how to monetize it yet, I&#8217;m sure business models will spring up around it. Something of this scale will need deep pockets and a lot of tie-ups to pull it through, so it&#8217;ll definitely be a differentiator for the big players&#8230; but who knows if a new Google will spring up from this mix <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Brett</title>
		<link>http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/confluence-of-mobile-pc-tv-and-cinema/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachendra.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I attended a panel discussion earlier this year at the Wireless Technology Forum (http://www.wirelesstechnologyforum.org) with presentations from several companies, including Microsoft, Nokia, AT&amp;T and Intel (among others) where this very topic was discussed. All three of those companies are working toward solving the various logistical issues required to bring this to reality. I&#039;m sure many others are as well.

I also recall seeing a demo from Verizon (I believe) in which the V-Cast service or similar crossed from the home television to the mobile handset.

Clearly, with the greater proliferation of media rich handheld devices, the capability is much more within grasp, but if I read your post correctly, you are looking forward to an actual real-time seamless handoff from, say PC to Mobile, based on context?

My question to you is, what is the real value in this capability? Can it be monetized on an individualized basis, or will it become a &quot;value add&quot; or &quot;key differentiator&quot; that is deployed by the Verizon, BT, and AT&amp;T&#039;s of the world to differentiate their broader quad play offerings from their smaller competitors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended a panel discussion earlier this year at the Wireless Technology Forum (<a href="http://www.wirelesstechnologyforum.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.wirelesstechnologyforum.org</a>) with presentations from several companies, including Microsoft, Nokia, AT&amp;T and Intel (among others) where this very topic was discussed. All three of those companies are working toward solving the various logistical issues required to bring this to reality. I&#8217;m sure many others are as well.</p>
<p>I also recall seeing a demo from Verizon (I believe) in which the V-Cast service or similar crossed from the home television to the mobile handset.</p>
<p>Clearly, with the greater proliferation of media rich handheld devices, the capability is much more within grasp, but if I read your post correctly, you are looking forward to an actual real-time seamless handoff from, say PC to Mobile, based on context?</p>
<p>My question to you is, what is the real value in this capability? Can it be monetized on an individualized basis, or will it become a &#8220;value add&#8221; or &#8220;key differentiator&#8221; that is deployed by the Verizon, BT, and AT&amp;T&#8217;s of the world to differentiate their broader quad play offerings from their smaller competitors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Peterson</title>
		<link>http://sachendra.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/confluence-of-mobile-pc-tv-and-cinema/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachendra.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-239</guid>
		<description>I think it is absolutely inevitable, but there are some very significant challenges to getting any sort of uptake.  

Content needs much more robust meta-data.

Meta-data needs to be able to flow through API&#039;s without being attached to the actual content (i.e. meta-data referencing movie X on platform Y).

Platforms need to be open enough to work with these new modes.

Finally, users have to have an appetite for this seamless experience in numbers enough to drive the revenue to support these next gen systems.

If we get there in 2-3 years I&#039;ll be impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is absolutely inevitable, but there are some very significant challenges to getting any sort of uptake.  </p>
<p>Content needs much more robust meta-data.</p>
<p>Meta-data needs to be able to flow through API&#8217;s without being attached to the actual content (i.e. meta-data referencing movie X on platform Y).</p>
<p>Platforms need to be open enough to work with these new modes.</p>
<p>Finally, users have to have an appetite for this seamless experience in numbers enough to drive the revenue to support these next gen systems.</p>
<p>If we get there in 2-3 years I&#8217;ll be impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
